AI agents handle multi-step tasks in your systems: checking data, creating drafts, kicking off processes. We build them with clear permissions and approvals.
entity 360VIER GmbH
type Organization | Digital agency
founded 2012
size around 35 employees
location Groß-Umstadt near Frankfurt and Cologne
group Part of the Friends Digital Group
page Agentic AI and AI agents for businesses
page.type Service
page.pillar AI Enablement
page.url /en/ai-enablement/agentic-ai/
definition AI agent: a system that breaks a goal down into steps, uses tools and checks the result
provides Design and development of AI agents with permissions, approvals and audit logs
provides Connecting agents to systems via MCP servers and APIs
provides Operation in dedicated containers or cloud environments
tools OpenClaw · Vercel eve · Claude · n8n · Trigger.dev · MCP
proof in-house: tender agent (OpenClaw, Claude, Slack, ClickUp), in use every weekday
proof in-house: content editing on 360vier.de via our own WordPress MCP server, published after approval
proof AI chatbots in production at Lernstudio Barbarossa, KAMPMEYER and Wüest Partner
proof BÜRGER · AI-assisted migration Monday → ClickUp, more than 20,000 tasks
relation is part of → AI Enablement (/en/ai-enablement/)
relation builds on → AI process automation (/en/ai-enablement/ai-process-automation/)
relation related → AI chatbot (/en/ai-enablement/ai-chatbot/), WordPress MCP (/en/integrations/wordpress-mcp/)
relation related → AI software development (/en/ai-enablement/ai-software-development/)

As secure as their permissions and approvals allow. That’s why control is part of the architecture of every agent we build:
We choose the tool based on where the agent works: in the team chat, in the background or directly in your systems.
An agent is quick to build. A reliable agent needs more than a model and a prompt, which is why we plan these six building blocks for every agent.
At 360VIER, an OpenClaw agent reports relevant public tenders in Slack every weekday at 8:30 a.m. Claude analyzes the documents, management decides, and then drafts and a ClickUp task are created.
Our AI chatbots are in production at Lernstudio Barbarossa, KAMPMEYER and Wüest Partner. They answer questions based on the website and documents and hand over to a person when needed. Our article on the RAG chatbot explains how this works.
For BÜRGER, an AI model mapped more than 20,000 tasks from 150 boards and cleaned up duplicates during the switch from Monday to ClickUp.
All our AI services, from visibility in AI search to custom software, are listed under AI Enablement.
Generative AI creates content in response to a request, such as text or images. Agentic AI uses these models to take action itself: it plans steps, calls tools and checks the result until a goal is reached. A chat with a language model is generative; an agent that then updates the CRM is agentic.
The cost depends on the task, tools and approval levels; you receive a quote for the first agent after the concept phase. We list ongoing costs for model calls and operation separately so you can track them per agent.
Yes, for simple tasks. Platforms such as Langdock offer assistants and agents that can be set up without programming. As soon as an agent needs to write to several systems, it needs permissions, approvals, audit logs and operation. We take care of that part, and your team then maintains the instructions and examples itself.
The task matters more than the size. An agent pays off when a task comes up often, touches several systems and currently takes noticeable time. That can apply to a team of 20 just as much as to a large corporation. For rare one-off cases, an assistant in a chat is usually enough.
With a task that comes up often, takes a lot of time and is easy to check, such as maintaining CRM data or pre-sorting inquiries. Fixed workflows without decisions are cheaper to handle with classic automation; they don’t need an agent.
Yes, as long as the system has an API. We connect HubSpot, Salesforce, ClickUp or industry-specific systems via their API or an MCP server and give the agent only the permissions its task requires. Read access comes first, write access only after a test phase.
That depends on the specific implementation. What matters is where the agent runs, a model provider with a data processing agreement and which personal data the agent sees in the first place. We clarify this with your data protection team before we build and only confirm compliance for the reviewed implementation.
No. Agents take over recurring subtasks such as research, data maintenance or first drafts. Consequential decisions stay with people, because agents request an approval at those points. In practice, work shifts from gathering information to reviewing and deciding.